在《武训传》批判的运动中,对影片最具杀伤力,也最富理性说服力的莫过于《武训历史调查记》。抛开方法,仅从文本上看,《调查记》科学严谨,尊重历史。它开列了一百六十余位被访人的名单,征引了大量史料,所有的结论似乎都有充分的证据———或当事人(主要是劳动人民)的口述,或文 In the “Wu Xun Chuan” criticized the movement, the film the most lethal, but also the most rational and convincing than the “Wu training history.” Put aside the method, only from the text point of view, “survey” scientific rigor, respect for history. It lists a list of more than 160 respondents and has drawn a large amount of historical data. All of the conclusions seem to have sufficient evidence - either oral or written by parties (mainly working people)