经常在报纸电视中看到××政府为民办×件实事的报道。例如《消费报》6月24日报道,作为1994年上海市政府为民办实事的项目之一——新增百家超市设专柜卖净菜,目前已进入了实质性的启动阶段。再如《浙江日报》9月5日载文,第10个教师节到来前夕,普陀区政府又为海岛教师办了5件实事。笔者认为这种提法不妥。 首先,实事求是为民办实事是各级政府最基本的工作态度。政府工作千头万绪,但只有轻重、大小、缓急,难易之分,没有实事不实事之别。哪个政府哪个工作人员会说自己办的不是实事呢?动笔前我曾翻阅《辞海》,想了解“实事”二字的修 Often seen in the newspaper and television × × government for the people to do × pieces of real stories. For example, “Consumer News” reported on June 24, as the Shanghai municipal government in 1994 as one of the projects of the people - to add one hundred supermarkets to set up counters selling clean vegetables, has now entered a substantive start-up phase. Another example is the “Zhejiang Daily” September 5, the eve of the 10th Teacher’s Day, Putuo District Government has done five practical things for island teachers. I think this formulation is wrong. First of all, seeking truth from facts is a basic fact of work for all levels of government. There are many things that government has to do with this task. However, there is no difference between the severity and the magnitude, the urgency and the ease of doing things. Which government staff will say that what they do is not a matter of fact? Before I wrote, I read the “Ci Hai” and wanted to understand the “real” word repair