论文部分内容阅读
目的研究并对比经腹子宫切除与阴式子宫切除的临床护理措施。方法收集接受子宫切除术的患者共128例,根据随机化分组原则分为对照组(64例)和观察组(64例),对照组接受经腹子宫切除术,观察组接受阴式子宫切除术,并给予针对性护理,将两组患者的疼痛程度评分、术中出血量、下床活动时间进行观察和对比。结果观察组的疼痛程度评分与对照组相比,差异显著;就术中出血量而言,观察组显著低于对照组;而在下床活动时间方面,观察组显著短于对照组,P<0.05。结论对于接受子宫切除术的患者,阴式子宫切除术的创口小、术中出血少、患者恢复快,能够使患者更加受益,而且相关的护理操作更加简单,值得推广应用。
Objective To study and compare the clinical nursing of abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. Methods A total of 128 patients undergoing hysterectomy were divided into control group (64 cases) and observation group (64 cases) according to the principle of randomization. The control group received abdominal hysterectomy and the observation group received vaginal hysterectomy , And given targeted care, the pain score of two groups of patients, intraoperative blood loss, ambulation time to observe and compare. Results The pain score of the observation group was significantly different from that of the control group. In terms of intraoperative blood loss, the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, while the observation group was significantly shorter than the control group in the time of getting out of bed, P <0.05 . Conclusion For patients undergoing hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy is less invasive, less intraoperative bleeding, faster recovery of patients, patients can benefit more, and the related nursing operations more simple and worthy of promotion.