论文部分内容阅读
在建筑設計工作中有时为了施工方便和簡化圖纸,对于某些数量不多、差别不大的构件採用統一标准是有好处的。但是,如果过分强調統一标准而忽視国家資金和材料的节約,也是不对的。下面針对单层厂房上的一些問题提出几点意見,供大家討論。 1.屋面防水工程根据技术規范的規定,屋面卷材的层数应根据屋面的坡度确定;坡度在7～15％吋,应下少于3层。但是在同一地区甚至同一建筑物上是否可以採用两种标准呢?这是值得討論的一个問題。一般設計人員往往忽視具体情况而一律採用同一标准,譬如在小至14平方公尺的汽車磅秤房和大至3万平方公尺的平爐車間,都用三层卷材,这种作法是下恰当的。当然,卷材的层数对于寿命是有关系的,应該考虑这个因素;但不能以之做为絕对因素。我認为在次要的建筑物上及在小跨度的建筑物上(如一般輔助車
Sometimes, in order to facilitate the construction and simplify drawings in the architectural design work, it is advantageous to adopt a uniform standard for some small number of components with little difference. However, it is also wrong to place too much emphasis on uniform standards while ignoring the savings of national funds and materials. Here are some suggestions for some issues on a single storey building for your discussion. 1. Roof waterproofing project According to the specification, the number of layers of roofing membrane should be determined according to the slope of the roof; the slope should be 7 to 15%, and less than 3 floors should be provided. But is it possible to adopt two standards in the same area or even in the same building? This is a question worth discussing. General designers often ignore the specific conditions and all use the same standard. For example, in small car scale rooms as small as 14 square meters and open furnace workshops as large as 30,000 square meters, three-layer coils are used. This method is appropriate. of. Of course, the number of layers of the coil is related to the life expectancy. This factor should be taken into account; however, it cannot be taken as an absolute factor. I think on secondary buildings and on small-span buildings (such as general auxiliary vehicles