论文部分内容阅读
哈尔滨《文化报》和《生活报》作为“文化报论争”的原始报刊资料,对研究“《文化报》事件”极其重要,它是展开研究还原历史真实的前提和基础。新时期以来,涉及“《文化报》事件”的文学史、省市史志以及萧军研究的著述中有关两报成立时间、总的期数、论争过程等方面都出现了错误的描述,为《文化报》研究和萧军研究带来不必要的认识分歧和学术混乱。为廓清事实,现就已发现的问题逐一分析考证。
The “Harbin News” and the “Daily News” as the original newspapers and periodicals of the “Cultural News” are extremely important to the study of “Cultural News” events. They are the preconditions and foundations for the study to restore historical truth. Since the beginning of the new period, there has been a wrong description of the history of literature, the history of provinces and cities and Xiao Jun's research on the timing of the establishment of the two newspapers, the total number of semesters, and the dispute process , Bringing unnecessary disagreement and academic confusion to the study of “Culture Daily” and the study of Xiao Jun. In order to clarify the facts, we have analyzed the problems we have found.