论文部分内容阅读
本文从批判性的视角概述了德国刑事诉讼法中关于证据采纳或者说是关于证据禁止的问题。证据禁止区分为非自主性证据使用禁止和自主性证据使用禁止。非自主性证据使用禁止可能是由于公诉中初步侦查时的取证错误导致的。就是否适用非自主性证据使用禁止这一问题,德国司法官会从几个方面加以考虑,例如,犯罪的严重性或者是取证错误的严重性。自主性证据使用禁止是由于侵犯了个人隐私。例如,私人日记不能作为证据使用。
This article outlines from a critical point the issue of adoption of evidence in the German Code of Criminal Procedure, or on the prohibition of evidence. Prohibition of Differentiation of Prohibition of Non-Autonomy Evidence Prohibition of Prohibition and Prohibition of Proof of Use. Prohibition of the involuntary use of evidence may be due to the wrong evidence collection at the preliminary investigation in public prosecution. As to whether the prohibition of the use of non-autonomous evidence applies, the German magistrate will consider several aspects, such as the seriousness of the crime or the seriousness of the forensic error. Prohibition of the use of independent evidence is a violation of privacy. For example, private diaries can not be used as evidence.