论文部分内容阅读
为了研究专家审稿的规律和特征,对2008年度《哈尔滨工业大学学报》96篇论文的195次送审情况进行统计分析。结果表明:副教授的审回率和A类意见率都高于教授;40岁以下专家审回率和A类意见率最高,40～44岁的专家次之,45～54岁的专家审回率和A类意见率低,65岁以上专家审回率不高,但是一旦审稿就会比较认真,而且返回迅速;学术氛围浓厚的著名学府的专家在审稿方面更有责任感和奉献精神;工作繁忙是专家不审稿和审稿不认真的一个主要原因。建议高校学报大胆选用青年审稿专家,不断优化审稿专家数据库,与审稿专家建立良好的合作关系。
In order to study the rules and characteristics of expert reviewers, this paper conducts a statistical analysis of the 195 trials conducted in 96 papers of Harbin Institute of Technology in 2008. The results show that the associate professor’s rate of review and the rate of Class A opinion are all higher than that of professors. The rate of expert review under 40 years of age and the opinion of class A are the highest, followed by those aged 40-44, and those aged 45-54 The rate of opinion in Category A is low, and the rate of review by experts over 65 is not high. However, once the reviewers review, they will be more serious and return quickly. Experts in prestigious academic institutions with strong academic atmosphere are more responsible and dedicated in reviewing papers. Busy is one of the main reasons why experts are not serious about reviewing and reviewing. It is suggested that college journals boldly select young reviewers, constantly optimize the database of reviewers, and establish good cooperative relations with reviewers.