论文部分内容阅读
陈兴良教授曾说过“刑罚的人性基础对于勇敢者来说,是一扇充满诱惑的门”。刑事古典学派与刑事实证学派也是因为对人性的理解有所不同,才会导致在一系列的刑法问题上都有对立的见解。本文试通过揭示刑事古典学派与刑事实证学派争议的终极点(理性人与经验人)。从理性人与经验人产生的社会背景入手进行分析,梳理我国近代的刑法立法与司法的人性基础,以大陆法系与英美法系的区别与融合为例证,探究适合我国当代刑法立法与司法的人性精髓。
Professor Chen Xingliang once said “The human foundation of punishment is a temptation for the brave.” Because of the differences in the understanding of human nature, the criminal classical school and the criminal empirical school also lead to opposing views on a series of criminal law issues. This paper attempts to reveal the ultimate point (rational people and experienced people) of the controversy between the classical criminal school and criminal substantive school. From the social background of rational man and experience man, this paper analyzes the humanity basis of modern criminal law legislation and judicature in our country. Taking the difference and integration between civil law system and Anglo-American law system as an example, Human essence.