《论语·雍也》:“子见南子,子路不说。夫子矢之曰:‘予所否者,天厌之!天厌之!’”此章文虽简短,却号称难解。以往的解释,关于“矢”字,有誓、陈、指、直告之四训;关于“否”字,有不、否塞二义;关于“厌”字,有弃、塞二解。而歧义集中于对“矢”字的解释。笔者认为,孔子既然“ “The Analects of Confucius Yong also”: “see the son of South son, the road does not say. Confucius said: ’to those who are not, Tired of the annoying!’” Although this chapter is brief, but known as intractable. As for the previous explanation, there are four trainings on the word “vector”, such as oath, chen, zhi, and qing; the word “no” means “yes” or “no”; Ambiguity focuses on the interpretation of the word “vector”. I believe that since Confucius "