论文部分内容阅读
作为犯罪构成必备要件的犯罪故意在不同的犯罪论体系中拥有不同的地位。在阶层式的犯罪论体系下,犯罪故意的地位经历了构成要件要素说、责任要素说、构成要件要素和责任要素说的争论,这背后反映出新康德主义哲学等不同哲学观的影响;在平面式四要件的犯罪论体系下,犯罪故意属于犯罪主观方面的当然内容,但这不意味着故意只是单纯的主观心态。在两种体系中,犯罪故意都是事实与规范的统一体,含有评价内容,是一个双层次的整体。只有坚持这种认识,犯罪故意才能承担起归责的重任。
Crimes that constitute an essential element of a crime deliberately have different positions in different systems of crime. Under the hierarchical crime theory system, the intentional position of crime has experienced the argument of the elements of constitution, the theory of elements of responsibility, the elements of constitution and the elements of responsibility, which reflects the influence of different philosophical views such as neo-Kantian philosophy Plane four elements of the crime theory system, the crime deliberately belong to the subjective aspects of crime, of course, but this does not mean that deliberately just a simple subjective attitude. In both systems, crime is deliberately a unity of facts and norms and contains the content of evaluation, which is a two-level whole. Only by upholding this kind of understanding can crime be deliberately to assume the responsibility of responsibility.