论文部分内容阅读
近日读《档案与建设》1988年第3期发表的赵爱国同志撰写的《档案文献编纂学体系及教材结构之我见》(以下简称赵文)及《档案》1988年第4期发表的卢思君同志撰写的《论档案文献编纂学的结构体系》(以卜简称卢文)两篇文章,颇受启发。这两篇文章的写作及几乎同时发丧说明,认真反思与全面探索档案文献编纂学学科体系问题,无疑已经到了应该进行的时候了。这种探索本身既说明了档案文献编纂学的研究已经转入较高的层次,也预示着档案文献编纂学的学科建设将有一个较大的突破性的进展。本文仅就此问题谈一些自己的粗浅看法,就教于档案文献编纂界的同行,并与赵爱国、卢思君两同志商榷。
Recently read Archives and Construction 1988 the third issue of Comrade Zhao Aiguo published “archives literature compilation system and textbook structure of my opinion” (hereinafter referred to as Zhao Wen) and “file” in 1988 the fourth issue of Lusi Jun Comrade authored “on the archives literature compilation of the structure of the system” (referred to as Bo Lu Wen) two articles, very inspired. The writing of these two essays and the explanation of the funeral at almost the same time, seriously reflecting upon and thoroughly exploring the subject system of archives literature compilation, has undoubtedly come to an end. This exploration itself not only shows that the research of archives literature compilation has gone to a higher level, but also indicates that there will be a big breakthrough in the discipline construction of archives literature compilation. This article only talks about some of its own superficial views on this issue, to teach in the compilation of archives literature peer, and with Zhao Aiguo, Lu Sijun two comrades to discuss.