本文通过比较民国《萧山县志稿》(以下简称民国志)和《清史稿》中的萧山人物传记,指出民国志和《清史稿》的材料来源不同导致了两者的侧重相异。而两者的不同有助于我们考察清代地方和中央政府对于政治、科举、法律等的不同态度,为清史研究提供解决问题的材料。因此,通过比较地方志和《清史稿》的差异,尤其是两者所“忽略”的内容,将会成为清史研究的新视角。 By comparing the biography of Xiaoshan in “Xiaoshan County People’s Manuscript” of the Republic of China and “Qing Shi Draft”, this article points out that the material sources of the Republican Chi and “Qing Shi Draft” lead to the difference of the two. The difference between the two helps us to examine the different attitudes of the local and central government in Qing Dynasty on politics, the imperial examination, the law and so on, and provide materials for the study of Qing history. Therefore, by comparing the differences between local chronicles and the Qing Dynasty’s Manuscripts, especially the content of the “neglect” of the two, it will become a new perspective of the Qing history research.