城市规划编制过程中的听证会设计

来源 :行政与法 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:woodma
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
听证会是正式的公众参与城市规划编制方式。政府规划部门应作为听证会的一般发起主体和组织者,控制性详细规划地段内的利害关系人应作为特殊提起主体。听证事项应限于对社会公共利益有重大影响的事项,并适当将某些事项排除。对于不同的听证事项可采取不同的听证模式。听证参加人应分为居民代表和专家代表,合理设置人数比例。听证主持人可由同级人民代表大会中具有规划知识背景的工作人员担任,以确保其公正性;听证参加人享有陈述和质询的权利;听证会记录应作为城市规划编制和审批的必备参考。违反听证规则时应追究相关工作人员的责任,但一般不影响城市规划的整体效力,可以补听证和申请国家赔偿方式救济。 Hearing is the formal method of public participation in urban planning. The government planning department should serve as the general sponsor and organizer of the hearing and the interested parties within the detailed control planning area should be the subject of special mention. Hearing matters should be limited to matters that have a significant impact on the public interest in the community and to exclude certain issues as appropriate. For different hearing matters can take a different mode of hearing. Hearing participants should be divided into resident representatives and expert representatives, a reasonable percentage of the number of people. The hearing moderator may be staffed by the people’s congress at the same level with planning knowledge background to ensure its impartiality; the participants of the hearing enjoy the right to make representations and questions; and the record of hearing should be taken as a necessary reference for the preparation and approval of urban planning. Violation of the rules of the hearing should be held accountable to the staff, but generally does not affect the overall effectiveness of urban planning, you can make up the hearing and apply for state compensation relief.
其他文献
技术理性思维方式对人类社会进行规划和设计,给人类带来的结果不仅是人类个体价值受到压抑,而且压抑了个体的道德中对他者负责的伦理意识,人类社会政治越来越依靠科学化和程
近些年"客户关系管理"(CRM)受到各界的广泛关注,越来越多的企业正在采用以客户为中心的管理模式来重新梳理自身的业务流程.
本文从体制变革的支撑点——政府管理这一角度展开思考,立足于构建和谐社会的背景,解读和谐新农村对乡镇管理的内在要求,反思现行的乡镇管理模式弊端,提出构建新型乡镇管理模式的
随着电信市场竞争的日益激烈,运营商的利润空间越来越小,开源的思想导致产品、服务的频繁创新.但是模仿难度的不断降低、模仿周期的不断缩短,使企业不得不从节流的角度思考产
本文以吉林省正在实施的"三化"统筹战略为视角,提出城乡一体化进程中面临的难点主要集中在:人往哪里去、钱从哪里来、土地问题怎样解决三个方面。笔者认为,应通过加大对农村经济