论文部分内容阅读
关于老舍的长篇小说《赵子曰》偏重于政治性的评价,在作品出现之后跟踪而至,且维持了不短的时间,其基本看法,是认为这个长篇对“五四”时代的进步学生运动作了不正确的描写和讽刺。从当时的报刊史料钩沉出的历史真相,却恰恰说明在中国现代文学史上,很少有人能像老舍在《赵子曰》中那样描写和表现“五四”后大学生的生活状况及精神面貌。他之所以不避《黑幕大观》之类的批评,也许认为它至少在揭露当时北京腐化的文化氛围上还有着独到之处罢。
The basic idea of Lao She’s novel Zhao Ziyue, which lays emphasis on the political evaluation, follows the track of the work and maintains it for a very short period of time. Improper student movement made an incorrect description and irony. However, from the historical facts of the time, the historical truths of the newspapers and periodicals precisely explain that in the history of modern Chinese literature, few people can describe and display the living conditions and spirit of college students after the May 4th Movement as Lao She did in Zhao Zi Yue face. The reason why he did not evade criticisms like “shady monuments” may be that it at least exposes the cultural atmosphere of Beijing’s corrupt culture at the time.