论文部分内容阅读
为评定修订心境状态量表(POMS-R)的信度和效度,并试图找出提示过度训练(OT)的参考值。在中小运动量期间,整群抽样调查广东省各专业运动队以评价量表内部一致性和结构效度,另在大中负荷训练后对部分运动队进行随访调查以确定POMS-R最佳参考值。结果表明:POMS-R的Cronbachalpha系数是0.9,因子分析析出7个因子,累计贡献率58.1%。对于自诉训练后有疲乏者,则当POMS总分大于130(男)135(女)提示有OT,其灵敏度为73.3%(男)90%(女),特异度为85%(男)、77%(女)。说明:POMS-R有较好信度和效度,对监测运动后疲乏者有无OT有一定价值。
To assess the reliability and validity of the revised mood status questionnaire (POMS-R), an attempt was made to find a reference value that suggested over-training (OT). During the small and medium-sized exercise, the cluster sampling survey of Guangdong Province, the professional sports teams to evaluate the internal consistency and structural validity of the scale, the other in the large and medium-load training part of the teams were followed up to determine the POMS-R best reference value . The results showed that the Cronbachalpha coefficient of POMS-R was 0.9, and seven factors were precipitated by factor analysis, with a cumulative contribution rate of 58.1%. For those who are tired after the private prosecution, the sensitivity is 73.3% (male), 90% (female), and 85% (male), when the POMS total score is greater than 130 (male) 135 (female) %(Female). Description: POMS-R has a better reliability and validity, the monitoring of post-exercise fatigue whether OT has a certain value.