论文部分内容阅读
目的:本文旨在将沉浸-反思问卷(Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire,RRQ)引入中国,并考察其在中国大学生样本中的信度和效度。方法:在6所高校中随机抽取1226名大学生完成测试,并在两周后对其中的150人进行重测。结果:①验证性因子分析显示,沉浸-反思两因子模型具有良好的结构效度,NNFI=0.974,IFI=0.978,CFI=0.978,RMSEA=0.077;②沉浸-反思问卷具有良好的项目鉴别度;③总量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.860,其中,沉浸为0.810,反思为0.837;④总量表的重测信度为0.657,其中,沉浸的为0.707,反思的为0.459;⑤沉浸与大五人格中N因素神经质呈正相关,反思与O因素开放性呈正相关;⑥沉浸与反思分量表均无性别差异。结论:沉浸-反思问卷中文版的信、效度达到测量学要求。
Objectives: This article aims to introduce the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) into China and investigate its reliability and validity in Chinese college students’ samples. METHODS: A total of 1,226 undergraduates were randomly selected from 6 universities to complete the test and 150 of them were retested two weeks later. Results: (1) Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two factors model has good structural validity, NNFI = 0.974, IFI = 0.978, CFI = 0.978, RMSEA = 0.077; ②The immersion- ③ The total scale Cronbach’sα coefficient of 0.860, of which, immersion was 0.810, reflecting 0.837; ④ total scale test reliability was 0.657, of which 0.707 for immersion, reflection of 0.459; ⑤ immersion and large There was a positive correlation between N-factor neuroticism and O-factor openness in five personality factors. ⑥ There was no gender difference in immersion and reflective subscales. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the Immersion-Retrospective Questionnaire has a validity that meets the requirements of Surveying.