论文部分内容阅读
甲:听说你在试验一种新的作文评分法? 乙:对。我这种评分法,可称为“分项评分法”。甲:这与传统的评分法有何不同? 乙:传统的作文评分法,可以称作“总印象评分法”。这种评分法,较难掌握统一的尺度,最易因人而异、因时而异。举例说,一篇文理稍通的文章,若置于多篇文理不通的文章之后批改,则如鹤立鸡群,批改者可能给个偏高的分数;反之,若一上手就批阅这篇文章,给分肯定不会高。我们参加高考阅卷都有这样的体验:开头评分偏紧,以后几天,夏日炎炎,昏昏欲睡,望文生厌,打分就容易倚高倚低。可见这种传统的总印象评分法,很难排除主观因素的干扰。
A: I heard that you are experimenting with a new composition score? B: Yes. My rating method, can be called “sub-grading method.” A: How is this different from the traditional grading method? B: The traditional composition grading method can be called the “Total Impression Grading Method”. This grading method, more difficult to grasp the standard of unity, the most easy to vary, from time to time. For example, an article with some liberal arts and literary style may be given a high score if it is placed in a number of articles that are unreasonable and unobtrusive. On the contrary, if an upper hand criticizes the article, Certainly not high. We have to participate in college entrance examination scoring such an experience: the beginning of the score tight, the next few days, the summer scorching, lethargic, Wen Wen Sheng tired, scoring easily lean high. Visible this traditional total impression scoring method, it is difficult to rule out the interference of subjective factors.