国内史学界对欧洲中心论问题的讨论,至今已历时八十余年,大致可以将其分为四个阶段:民国时期、20世纪50年代至改革开放、改革开放初至20世纪末、21世纪初至今。这四个阶段中对欧洲中心论的批评,都有着各自所处时代的鲜明特点。对欧洲中心论的批评并非孤立的学术问题,它在不同时期所呈现的不同特点,与不同时期世界史研究的整体状况、不同时期各自的史学理念,以及不同时期东西方之间的力量对比等都直接相关。 Domestic historians have discussed the issue of European centralism for more than eighty years and can be roughly divided into four stages: during the Republic of China, from the 1950s to the reform and opening up, from the first to the twentieth century through the reform and opening up, at the beginning of the 21st century to date. The criticisms of the Eurocentrism in these four stages all have distinct characteristics of the times in which they are located. Criticism of Eurocentrism is not an isolated academic problem. Its different characteristics in different periods are related to the overall state of the study of world history in different periods, their respective historical ideas in different periods, and the comparison of the forces between East and West in different periods Are directly related.