论文部分内容阅读
我国目前适用录音录像规定的适用现状主要表现为,对录音录像规定的适用缺乏监督机制,存在补录或者重复录音录像的现状,将犯罪嫌疑人带出看守所外未规定要进行录音录像。就产生这些现状的原因而言,有很多方面的因素,在新刑诉法为增加该条规定之前,侦查人员主要以获取犯罪嫌疑人的口供为定案依据,以传统的方式进行对犯罪嫌疑人的口供的攻破。因此在出台该规定后,侦查人员不愿使用,其次,在立法本身存在不够明确和科学地方。因此,对我国录音录像制度存在的问题提出一些完善的建议,在不超越法律规定的范围,对立法进行细化的规定。
At present, the applicable status quo of the application of audio-video recording and recording in our country is mainly manifested as the lack of supervision mechanism for the application of audio-video recording provisions and the existence of supplementary recording or repeated audio-video recording. The suspect is not required to carry out audio-video recording outside the detention center. In terms of the reasons for the occurrence of these conditions, there are many factors in the new Criminal Procedure Law to increase the provisions of the article, the investigators mainly to obtain the suspect’s confession for the verdict on the basis of the traditional way of criminal suspects Confession of the confession. Therefore, after the promulgation of this provision, investigators are reluctant to use it. Secondly, there is not enough clarity and scientific place in the legislation itself. Therefore, some suggestions are put forward to the existing problems of the audio and video recording system in our country, and the legislation should be refined without exceeding the legal provisions.