论文部分内容阅读
目的 :观察较大剂量的复方板蓝根对急性咽炎的临床疗效。方法 :将 14 6例急性咽炎患者随机分为 3组 ,复方板蓝根组 4 8例 ,口服正常剂量 2～ 4倍的复方板蓝根 8～ 15片 /次 ,3次 /d ;头孢氨苄组 4 6例 ,口服头孢氨苄 375mg ,3次 /d ;复方板蓝根 +头孢氨苄组 5 2例 ,口服复方板蓝根 8～ 15片 /次和头孢氨苄 375mg ,3次 /d。 3组患者均含服草珊瑚含片 ,2片 /次 ,6次 /d ,治疗 3～ 6d。结果 :复方板蓝根组总有效率为 95 .8% ,头孢氨苄组总有效率为 6 9.5 % ,复方板蓝根 +头孢氨苄组总有效率为 98% ,复方板蓝根组疗效明显优于头孢氨苄组 (P <0 .0 0 5 ) ,而复方板蓝根组和复方板蓝根 +头孢氨苄组比较差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :较大剂量的复方板蓝根治疗急性咽炎安全有效 ,可为首选
Objective: To observe the clinical effect of larger dose of compound Banlangen on acute pharyngitis. Methods: One hundred and sixty-six patients with acute pharyngitis were randomly divided into three groups: 48 patients in the group of Radix Isatidis and 8 to 15 tablets of Radix Isatidis in the dose of 2-4 times, and 46 cases in the cefalexin group , Oral cephalexin 375mg, 3 times / d; compound Radix and cephalexin group 52 cases, oral compound Radix 8 ~ 15 tablets / and cephalexin 375mg, 3 times / d. 3 groups of patients with grass coral tablets, 2 tablets / time, 6 times / d, treatment 3 ~ 6d. Results: The total effective rate of Radix Isatidis was 95.8%, that of cefalexin was 6 9.5%, and that of Radix Isatidis + cefalexin was 98%. The efficacy of Radix Isatidis was superior to that of cefalexin (P <0 0 05), but there was no significant difference between compound group Radix Isatidis and Compound Radix Isatidis + Cefalexin (P> 0.05). Conclusion: A large dose of compound Banlangen is safe and effective in the treatment of acute pharyngitis, which may be the first choice