Heller案是新旧原旨主义直接交锋并以新原旨主义为裁判依据的案件。原旨主义发展至今经历了三个主要的阶段:原初意图;原初理解;原初公意。在非原旨主义者的批评下,原旨主义已经不再是内在一致、统一的理论,然而并不能因此就否定原旨主义的理论意义,虽然原旨主义不能作为宪法解释的终点,但可以作为起点。 The case of Heller is a case of direct opposition of old and new fundamentalists and based on neo-fundamentalism. The development of originalism has gone through three major stages so far: the original intention; the original understanding; original public opinion. Under the criticism of the non-originalists, the originalism is no longer an inherently consistent and unified theory. However, it can not deny the theoretical significance of the originalism. Although originalism can not serve as the end of the constitutional interpretation, As a starting point.