论文部分内容阅读
奥斯汀对感觉材料理论的驳斥是他运用语言探究方法检查传统哲学论证的一个典型范例。他认为“我们 是感知物质事物还是感知感觉材料？”这个传统知觉问题本身似是而非，而建基在“依据错觉的论证”之 上的感觉材料理论则包含大量迷惑人的谬误和各种隐藏着的动机。艾耶尔所表述的论证包含许多语词上 的误用或滥用以及诸多对知觉事实的错误概括，其真实动机就是要把现实世界观念化或虚幻化。奥斯汀 对感觉材料理论的驳斥并非仅具有否定意义，在批驳感觉材料理论过程中，他还在知觉对象、知觉方式、 知觉描述、经验性质等方面提出正面的观点。他的观点至少校正了我们思考知觉问题的框架和方向。
Austin’s refutation of sensory material theory is a typical example of his use of linguistic inquiry to examine traditional philosophical arguments. In his opinion, the problem of traditional consciousness, which is whether we perceive material things or perceived sense of material ?, seems plausible, and the theory of sensory materials based on the argument of illusion contains a great deal of confusion and various hidden motivation. Ayer’s argument includes many verbal misuses or abuses and many false generalizations of perceptual facts. The real motivation is to conceptualize or unrealize the real world. Austin’s refutation of sensory material theory is not only of negative meaning. In refuting the theory of sensory material, Austin also put forward positive opinions in terms of perceived objects, ways of perception, descriptions of sensations, and the nature of experience. His view at least corrected the framework and direction of our thinking about perceptions.