论文部分内容阅读
谢持的政治主张,一开始就遭致各方面的压力和曲解,后被简单地划分为国民党内左右翼的分野和权力对抗。其实,谢持起草的反对苏俄操纵中国的国民党上海二大《宣言》及其“西山会议派”的政治主张,代表了当时知识界的主流观点。后人简单地以“清共”和反对孙中山“三大政策”的主张来取代、否定谢持等人的政治主张,是不公允的,而且也掩盖了事实真相。谢持真正抵制与反对的,是马林、鲍罗廷等人推行的激化矛盾和充满危机的所谓中国国民党与中国共产党的“党内合作”。
The political ideas that were gratefully supported were pressured and misinterpreted by various parties from the very beginning and then simply divided into the Kuomintang left and right wing divisions and power confrontations. In fact, the political propositions drafted by the Kuomintang opposing the Soviet Union’s manipulation of China’s Second Big Shanghai Declaration and its “Xishan Meeting School ” represent the prevailing viewpoints of the intellectual circles at that time. The posterity simply replaced the idea of “clearing the communists” and opposing “the three policies” of Sun Yat-sen and denied the political opinions of those who supported Xie and others. It was unfair and also masked the truth. The real boycott and objection is to be supported by the so-called “inter-party cooperation” between the so-called Chinese Kuomintang and the Chinese Communist Party that are intensified by marin and borodin and intensified by crises.