论文部分内容阅读
文章对梅祖麟关于动补结构产生于六朝辩说中的几个主要论点及其论据进行了认真剖析和深入探讨 ,发表了不同看法。提出 :动补结构不能与复合动词混而为一 ;带没带宾语不能作为鉴定动补结构的决定性条件 ;汉语发展史上没有出现过“自动词化” ;具有因果联系的特殊兼语式不是出现于六朝 ,而在先秦汉语中就存在。由此而证明 ,“六朝说”不可信。动补结构这一重要的语法形式至少在汉代已成熟并大量产生。
The article made a careful analysis and discussion on the main arguments and arguments made by Mei Zuolin about the dialectical structure of the movement supplement produced in the six dynasties and expressed different opinions. It is proposed that the verb-complement structure can not be mixed with the compound verb, and the belt can not be used as the decisive condition to identify the verdict structure. There is no “verbalization” in the history of Chinese development. In the Six Dynasties, but in Pre-Qin Chinese there. This proves that “the Six Dynasties” is not credible. The important syntactic form of the complement structure has matured and produced in large quantities in Han Dynasty at least.