晚清以来,文言政论文的主要风格从宣传政见、煽动情绪渐渐走上辨疑析理,文章的深度、广度、逻辑性、严密性都大为增强。章土钊的“甲寅文体”被认为是文辞谨严、讲求逻辑、注重学养的论说文典范,既有欧化的一面,又与唐宋古文、桐城派古文以及八股时文有密切的关系,代表着古文传统在清末民初的新变。它推崇柳文精致的修辞技巧,但却有着混杂的语汇和西化的句法;它认同桐城派的“雅洁”之说,却突破了文言不宜说理的限制,写出了桐城派力所不及的大文章;它存有八股时文的遗风,但在精神上却反对八股文;它采纳有骈文的成分,但都是服务于散体的。“甲寅文体”的成就提醒人们,将近代以来的文言散文视为一个不成气候的尾声,对其中蕴藏的某些现代性因素和由此产生的重要变化视而不见,或许是一种有待修正的成见。 Since the late Qing Dynasty, the main style of the classical Chinese political essay has spread from political propaganda to sentiment, and has gradually taken the form of doubt and analysis. The depth, breadth, logic and rigor of the article have been greatly enhanced. Zhang Tuzhao “Jiayin style ” is considered censor cautious, emphasis on logic, pay attention to the theoretical model of education, both the European side, but also with the Tang and Song Dynasties, Tongcheng School of ancient essay and the classics is closely related , Represents the new change of ancient prose tradition in late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China. It praises Liu’s exquisite rhetorical skills, but it has a mixed vocabulary and westernized syntax. It recognizes Tongcheng’s theory of “elegantness,” but breaks through the restrictions that should not be reasoned by classical Chinese. It does not have a big article; it holds the legacy of the eight-part essay but nevertheless opposes the eight-part essay in spirit; it adopts the pamphlet’s composition, but both serve the bulk. The accomplishments of “Jiayin Style” remind people that the classical prose in modern times is regarded as an apocalyptic ending, which turns a blind eye to some of the modernity elements and the important changes that are enshrined in it. It may be something that needs correction Prejudice.