论文部分内容阅读
复兴的农村家族将会积极地以整体姿态不同程度地参与村政活动,这一点在学界已获得了较为广泛的认同,但问题的关键在于该“参与”会对村级民主产生何种性质的影响。在对家族参与具体路径与过程进行有效的微观研究之前做出有关影响性质的价值判断显然是草率的,因为不同的参与路径会对最终的影响结果产生不同的影响。家族的村政参与主要遵循层次并不一致的五大路径,即选举路径、政党路径、乡镇路径、非合作路径和第三方路径等进行,五大路径的叠加构成了抽象意义上的家族的村政参与过程。
The revival of the rural families will actively participate in the village activities in an overall manner to varying degrees, which has gained more widespread recognition in the academic circles. However, the crux of the issue lies in the nature of the “participation” Impact. Making value judgments about the nature of an influence before conducting an effective micro-study of the specific pathways and processes involved in family involvement is clearly sloppy because different paths of participation can have different effects on the final outcome. Family participation in the village government follows five major paths that are inconsistent in level: election path, party path, township path, non-cooperation path and third-party path. The superposition of the five major paths constitutes an abstract process of family involvement in the village.