论文部分内容阅读
英美法系法律经济学家将法律的实施界分为公共实施与私人实施两种方式。反垄断私人实施最早源于美国,《谢尔曼法》第7条之规定可被视为其源头。在美国成功经验的推动下,越来越多的国家建立了反垄断法私人实施制度。反垄断私人实施可以弥补公共实施的不足,有利于克服反垄断法的不确定性,它对受害人的直接补偿还可促进矫正正义的实现,同时私人主体广泛参与反垄断法实施还是竞争文化培养和发展的助推器。
Anglo-American legal economists divide the implementation of law into two modes: public implementation and private implementation. The antitrust private practice originated in the United States. The provisions of Article 7 of the Sherman Act can be regarded as its source. Driven by the successful experience of the United States, more and more countries have established a system for the private enforcement of anti-monopoly law. The implementation of antitrust can make up for the lack of public implementation, help to overcome the uncertainty of antitrust law, its direct compensation for victims can also promote the realization of corrective justice, while the private subject is widely involved in the implementation of anti-monopoly law or culture of competition And the development of boosters.