论文部分内容阅读
我国《刑法》将教唆犯置于总则第二章第三节共同犯罪中加以规制,按照共犯理论教唆人只有与被教唆人之间具有共犯关系时教唆人才能成其为教唆犯,否则若不是共同犯罪就不能成为教唆犯。但《刑法》第29条第2款的规定却出现了非共犯的处罚情况,使刑事立法处于尴尬境地。教唆犯的性质到底是什么,非共犯教唆行为能否成为刑法所调整的对象,共犯体系又该如何架构,笔者用共犯理论对我国教唆犯刑事立法予以审视,重新定位并提出了立法完善建议。
China’s “Criminal Law” will be abettor placed in the general provisions of the second section third section common crime to be regulated, according to the principle of accomplice abettor only with the abettor with an accomplice relationship abettors can become abettors, or if not Joint crime can not be an abettor. However, the provisions of article 29, paragraph 2, of the Criminal Law have resulted in the punishment of non-complicity, putting criminal legislation in an awkward position. What is the nature of the abettor and whether abettorial abetting can be the object of the criminal law adjustment? How should the system of accomplice be constructed? The author uses the theory of accomplice to examine the criminal legislation of abettor in China, repositions it and puts forward suggestions for perfecting the legislation.