论文部分内容阅读
是否遵循实事求是的方法论原则,是判定唯物史观还是唯心史观的根本标志,也是二者判然有别的分水岭。唯物史观不以任何先验的东西为前提,唯心史观则相反。凡是不遵循实事求是方法论原则乃至有意违反这一原则的历史观,毫无疑问一定是唯心史观,而绝非唯物史观。根据实事求是原则去考察历史,符合过去人们所理解的五种社会形态理论本来所规定的意义和内涵,因生产力不断发展而导致五种社会形态依次演进更替的例子,在人类历史上并不存在。
Whether to follow the methodological principle of seeking truth from facts is the fundamental criterion for judging the historical materialism or the idealist historical ideal, and it is also a separate watershed between the two. Historical materialism does not take any a priori as the premise, but the conception of the idealism is the opposite. Any view of history that does not follow the principle of seeking truth from facts and even intentionally violates this principle will undoubtedly be the idealist view of history rather than the historical materialism. Examining history according to the principle of seeking truth from facts meets the meanings and connotations originally defined by the five forms of social theory that people had come to understand. The successive evolvement of productive forces led to the successive evolu- tion and replacement of five social forms, which did not exist in human history.