论文部分内容阅读
目的:对剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择进行探讨,从而提高产科质量。方法:选择2009年1月至1012年月来我院进行剖宫产术后再次妊娠的160例孕妇作为研究对象,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析,按阴道试产分娩和剖宫产分娩分为两组,比较孕妇见的出血量、住院时间以及并发症等。结果:研究数据显示,剖宫产手术后的再次妊娠,剖宫产组孕妇的出血量、住院时间以及并发症都比阴道分娩组来的高,存在明显的差异性。结论:经过研究发现,剖宫产不再是再次妊娠的必要分娩方式,在保证产科的安全性以及严格地掌握阴道试产的适应症与禁忌症的前提下,可以选择阴道试产,这更有利于提高产科的质量。
Objective: To explore the choice of pregnancy delivery after cesarean section, so as to improve the quality of obstetrics. Methods: A total of 160 pregnant women who underwent cesarean pregnancy after cesarean section in our hospital from January 2009 to October 2012 were selected as the research object. The clinical data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. According to vaginal delivery and cesarean section delivery For the two groups, see the amount of bleeding pregnant women, hospital stay and complications. Results: The data showed that after pregnancy after cesarean section, pregnant women with cesarean section had higher bleeding, length of hospital stay and complications than vaginal delivery group. There was a significant difference. Conclusion: After study, it is found that cesarean section is no longer the necessary mode of delivery for re-pregnancy. Under the precondition of ensuring the safety of obstetric and strictly controlling the indications and contraindications of vaginal trial, vaginal trial can be chosen Help to improve the quality of obstetrics.