论文部分内容阅读
财产犯罪,要求犯罪对象必须属于财物或财产性利益,并且受害人存在财产损失。如何认定单位职员窃取“欠条”向债务人“讨债”之行为性质?笔者从认定欠条是否属于数额较大的财物或者财产性利益的角度出发,确认“欠条”能否成为财产犯罪的犯罪对象。在此基础上,梳理学界对该类行为定性的意见,在对各个意见逐一评析的基础上,否定欠条可以作为财产犯罪中的数额较大的(普通)财物、否定第三人窃取的欠条被认定为财产性利益,进而否定该类行为有罪的观点,从而得出该类行为无罪的结论。
Property crimes require that the object of crime must belong to the property or property interests, and the victims of the existence of property damage. How to identify the unit staff to steal the “IOUs ” to the debtor “debt collection ” nature of the behavior of the author from the identification of IOUs belong to a larger amount of property or property interests from the perspective of confirmation “IOUs ” can become property Criminal object of crime. On this basis, combing academic opinion on the qualitative behavior of these types of behavior, on the basis of one by one criticism of each opinion, the negation of IOUs can be used as a large amount of (ordinary) property in property crimes, negating third-person stolen IOUs As a property interest, and then denied the guilty behavior of such acts, thus come to the conclusion of such acts innocent.