论文部分内容阅读
关于药家鑫应否判处死刑立即执行的问题,法院相对夸大了不利于药家鑫的量刑情节,过分贬低了药家鑫投案自首应当具有的从轻处罚辩护功能。没有充分考虑到自首情节的政策意义、药家鑫自首的程序意义以及药家鑫父母陪首的量刑意义。药家鑫案的死刑适用虽然迎合了广大民众朴素的“杀人偿命”观念,却未能完美地诠释我国司法机关一贯坚持的“保留死刑、严格控制死刑、少杀、慎杀”的死刑政策。
On the issue of whether the drug manufacturer Xin should be sentenced to death immediately, the court exaggerated the circumstances that did not favor the drug dealer Xin and devalued the lighter punishment that the drug dealer Xin surrendered should have. Did not fully take into account the policy significance of surrendered themselves to the patient, the procedural significance of the drug king Xin surrendered and the sentencing of Xin parents accompany the senate significance. Although the application of the death penalty in the case of drug family Xin caters to the simple concept of “killing people for life”, it has failed to perfectly interpret the principle of “keeping the death penalty, strictly controlling the death penalty, killing less and cautiously killing” The death penalty policy.