论文部分内容阅读
本文报导了101例白血病及26例感染患者的髓细胞NAP活性测定。结果急非淋、急淋与淋巴瘤细胞白血病间无显著性差异,均可呈强阳性反应,亦可为阴性,慢粒髓细胞,NAP活性明显减低,慢粒急变者则明显升高,其酶活性与感染及类白血病反应相似。故NAP活性测定呈强阳性反应者,应首先考虑类白血病反应,但不能完全排除白血病之可能,特别是慢粒急变的初发型及CNL,应结合临床进一步探讨其它鉴别诊断之依据。NAP活性测定不能作为鉴别急淋与急非淋的可靠依据。
This article reports the determination of NAP activity in myeloid cells from 101 leukemias and 26 infected patients. Results There was no significant difference between acute leiomyoma and acute lymphocytic leukemia and lymphocytic leukemia, which showed a strong positive reaction, negative or chronic granulocyte, significantly decreased NAP activity, and acute abscess Enzyme activity and infection and leukemia similar reactions. Therefore, the determination of NAP activity was strongly positive, should first consider leukemia response, but can not completely rule out the possibility of leukemia, especially the early onset of chronic myeloid and CNL should be combined with clinical further explore the basis for the differential diagnosis. NAP activity determination can not be used as a reliable basis for the identification of acute lymphocytic and acute non-lymph.