“整理国故”运动是吕思勉史学转换的关键和枢纽。吕氏的学术理路受其拉动,并在内外交织的紧张与调整中,走上了新的研究道路。对于吕氏史学来说,“整理国故”运动的意义不仅在于这一学术潮流带来了外在时势的推动,更与自身的学术理路实现了对接并轨。在这一进程中,吕思勉走出了“国粹”派影响,他以考据为基础,以通贯研究为特色,以科学方法为支撑,终于在20世纪20年代实现了史学方法论的建构,成为民国“新历史考证学”的代表。随着史学研究的精密化及中国化日益加深,作为植根于传统的吕氏史学,与胡适为代表的“西洋汉学”在学术取径上渐行渐远,其间既有人事、学路之纠葛,更反映了中国学者的独立思考和日渐成熟。从某种程度上来说,这是史学及国学研究中要求积淀,讲求内在深入研究与速成、外在式路径之间的一种对立。 “Finishing state” movement is the key and hub of the historiography transformation of Lu Si-mian. Lu’s academic philosophy was driven by it and embarked on a new road of study in the tension and readjustment both inside and outside the organization. For Lu Shi historiography, the significance of the movement to “organize the country” is not only because this academic trend has brought about the promotion of external times, but also has merged with its own academic approach. In this process, Lu Si-min came out of the influence of the “nationalist” school of thought. Based on his examination and research, he took the research as the characteristic and supported by the scientific method and finally realized the construction of methodology of historiography in the 1920s , Become the Republic of China “new historical research ” on behalf of. With the deepening of the study of the history and the deepening of the study of Chinese culture, as the root of traditional Lu Shi historiography, “Western Sinology ”, represented by Hu Shi, is getting more and more distant from the academic path, including both personnel and learning Road disputes, but also reflects the independent thinking of Chinese scholars and maturing. To a certain extent, this is the opposite between the requirement of accumulation in the study of history and Sinology, the emphasis on inner in-depth research and the quick and extrinsic path.