论文部分内容阅读
从作者、审稿专家和编辑三者关系入手,分析三者的态度对论文取舍的决定性作用。将评审专家意见进行分类,并根据作者修改论文时对专家意见的不同回应态度,分析、总结其对论文的审稿结果所带来的影响。为此提出编辑的应对策略,并以一实例进行验证。认为编辑的正确应对既能平衡作者与审稿专家之间的分歧,又能提升作者的论文撰写能力。这为提高科技期刊的影响力,进一步吸引到更多、更高水平的论文打下基础。
Beginning with the relationship among the author, reviewers and editors, this paper analyzes the decisive role of the three attitudes toward the choice of papers. According to the different attitude of the author to the opinion of experts when analyzing the dissertation, the author analyzes and summarizes the influence on the reviewing result of the dissertation. To this end put forward the editing strategy, and verify with an example. He believes that the correct response of editors can not only balance the disagreements between author and reviewer, but also improve the author’s writing ability. This laid the foundation for furthering the influence of sci-tech periodicals and further attracting more and higher-level papers.