论文部分内容阅读
我国《刑事诉讼法》第189条规定,二审案件如果事实不清或者证据不足的,二审法院可以在查清事实后改判,也可以裁定撤销原判,发回重审;第191条又具体规定了一审哪些程序违法,二审法院应当撤销原判,发回重审。这是我国法律有关规制发回重审的制度框架,从总的来说,发回重审制度在一定程度上保证了个案的质量,减少了差错案件的发生率,但同时也带来了诸多弊病,而其所蕴涵的价值也因实践中的种种悖论而倍受质疑。发回重审究竟还有没有存在的必要也成为了学者们争论的焦点之一。
Article 189 of China's Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that if the second instance is unclear in facts or insufficient in evidence, the second instance court may reverse the case after finding out the facts and may also rule that the original verdict be rescinded and be sent back for retrial. Article 191 further stipulates Where the first instance is illegal, the court of second instance should revoke the original verdict and send it back for retrial. This is the institutional framework for sending back and retrial the relevant regulations of our country. In general, sending the retrial system to a certain extent ensures the quality of the case and reduces the incidence of error cases. However, it also brings many drawbacks, And the value implied by it is also questioned due to various paradoxes in practice. It is also one of the focuses of scholars' controversy that the necessity of sending retrials after all exists.