论文部分内容阅读
由决策机关引入第三方去评估部门间争议较大的重要立法事项,其运行效果涉及到了该制度本身的正当性与否。影响第三方评估立法有效性的因素至少有三个:前提预设的模糊性、问题类型的多样性、客观中立的失实性。在不确定的前提之下,就会影响到第三方评估立法的引入,从而无法进行有效性判断。立法事项类型中的价值判断问题,将导致第三方评估立法不具有有效性,而对于解释选择问题和立法技术问题而言,第三方评估立法仅具有一定程度的有效性。第三方客观中立的假设在现实中并不一定为真,将严重损害第三方评估立法的有效性。对此,至少需要三个可能的协调策略进行应对,以化解三个影响因素对第三方评估立法的有效性所产生的负面效果。
The decision-making organs are introduced to third parties to assess important issues of controversy among major departments. Their operational effectiveness involves the legitimacy of the system itself. There are at least three factors that affect the validity of the third party’s assessment of the legislation: preconditioning ambiguity, diversity of question types, and objectively neutral dishonesty. Under the premise of uncertainty, the introduction of third-party assessment legislation will be affected, so that the validity judgment can not be made. The issue of value judgments in the types of legislative matters will lead to third-party assessment of the validity of the legislation, and third-party assessment legislation has only a certain degree of validity in terms of interpretation of choice and legislative technical issues. The assumption of third-party objective neutrality is not necessarily true in reality, and will seriously undermine the validity of third-party assessment legislation. To this end, at least three possible coordination strategies are needed to deal with the negative effects of the three factors on the effectiveness of third-party assessment legislation.