在鲁迅看来,士人无论坚持“行道”与否,结果都是悲剧性的。坚持“行道”理想意味着“天下无道,以身殉道”的气节悲剧,俯就“无道”现实则意味着“枉道以从势”的异化丑剧。对深受章太炎治学思路影响的鲁迅来说,他不可能像今文学家那样以“拨乱反正”的方式试图重建“道”的合法性,也不可能如当代新儒家那样试图以“创造性的转化”来重构“道”的现代性。 In Lu Xun’s view, regardless of insistence on the “road” or not, the results are tragic. Adherence to the ideals of “the roadway” means that the tragedy of “no way in the world, the martyrdom of death in the world” leads to the dissimilation and ugliness of “no way” in reality. For Lu Xun, deeply influenced by Zhang Taiyan’s thinking, he can not possibly attempt to reconstruct the legitimacy of “Taoism” in the same way as contemporary writers do, nor can it try to “ ”Creative Transformation" to Reconstruct the Modernity of Tao.