关于尧舜禅让,王汉昌在《禅让制研究》(《北京大学学报》,1987年第6期)一文中提出,把尧舜禅让说成选贤让位、品德高尚,评价过高,实际上,这是我国上古时代原始民主选举制的结果。在选举过程中,关键的一条是“一致同意”原则,即在部落联盟会议上,只有取得一致同意的表决,才能做出决定。选举舜作尧的继承人和 Regarding Yao and Shun’s entreaties, Wang Hanchang put forward in his article “Research on Chan System” (“Journal of Peking University”, No. 6, 1987) that Yao and Shun Chan should be said to be elders and gentlemen, noble in character and overvalued. In fact, The Result of Primitive Democracy in Ancient China. In the course of the election, the crucial one is the principle of “consensus”, that is, at tribal coalition meetings, only decisions that have been agreed upon can be decided. To elect Shunzuo Yao’s successor