论文部分内容阅读
通过可以公开查询到的中国仲裁机构审理的国际货物贸易案件,实证分析CISG公约在中国仲裁中适用的原因和具体情况,发现公约第74、78条等适用的频率最高,但不同案件仲裁庭对具体条款的理解和运用并不完全一致。由于公约并没有一个权威地解释机构,不同国家仲裁实践在条文理解上存在分歧是正常的,但可能不利于国际贸易纠纷的公平合理解决,需要从公平正义角度善意解释公约。
Through the publicly available cases of international trade in goods arbitrated by Chinese arbitration institutions, this paper empirically analyzes the reasons and circumstances of the application of the CISG Convention in Chinese arbitration. It finds that Article 74 and Article 78 of the Convention have the highest frequency of application, but the arbitration tribunals in different cases Specific terms of understanding and use are not exactly the same. Since the convention does not have an authoritative interpretation of the institution, it is normal for the arbitration practice in different countries to disagree with the provisions. However, this may not be conducive to a fair and reasonable settlement of international trade disputes, and the treaty needs to be interpreted in good faith from the perspective of fairness and justice.