元代文字学家周伯琦所著《六书正讹》,是一部阐述《说文》、记录古文、考辨俗字的字书。《四库全书总目》引《诗经.谷风》“采葑采菲,无以下体”二句[1],以喻《六书正讹》在字形、反切、释义等问题上,不免有瑕瑜互见之憾,这个评价是中肯的。然而丁福保引钱大昕《十驾斋养新录》卷十三“《六书正讹》”条却谓该书“诞谩叵信,视同戏剧”[2]。姚孝遂先生批评说:“丁氏作《自叙》时已是一九二八年,当时商周古文字已大量出土,并已开展了相当广泛而深入的研究,有很多卓越成果足以参考。而丁氏犹然墨守成说,只能是一种偏见。”[3]钱氏此说一出,后人翕然信从。其实不然。今以《六书正讹》所收古文为例,来说明周伯琦对古文字研究的是非得失。所据底本为上海图书馆藏元至正十五年(1355)高德基等刻本[4]。以下简称《正讹》。 ZHOU Bo-qi, a literary scholar in the Yuan Dynasty, wrote a book titled “Six Books Is True,” a book that expresses “Shuo Wen”, records ancient prose, and discusses folk typologies. “Sikuquanshuzongmu” cited “the Book of Songs. Gu Feng” “Mining mining Philippine, without the body ” two sentences [1], to metaphor “Six books are correct” in the glyphs, anti-cut, interpretation and other issues, inevitably There are flawed Yu each other’s regret, this evaluation is fair. However, Ding Fubao quoted Qian Daixin, “Ten Thousands Raiders New Record,” Volume XIII, “” The Sixth Book is Correct, “but said the book was” born in the same place as the drama. “ Mr. Yao Xiaosui criticized: ”Ding’s autobiography was already in 1928, when the ancient Shang and Zhou dynasties were unearthed in a large number of texts and a great deal of extensive and in-depth research has been carried out. There are many outstanding achievements that are sufficient for reference. His still defensive to say, can only be a prejudice. “[3] Qian said this one, the descendants obey. actually not. Now take the ancient prose received by ”Six Books Correctly Rejecting Errors“ as an example to illustrate Zhou Boqi’s merits and demerits of ancient writing research. According to the base copy of the Shanghai Library yuan is positive fifteen years (1355), such as high-Tekki engraved book [4]. The following referred to as ”is correct."