论文部分内容阅读
从1969年蒯因提出的自然化认识论思想至今,自然化认识论受到了来自哲学家和认识论家的广泛关注,形成了褒贬不一的看法。与传统的以辩护为中心的认识论不同,自然化认识论要解决的是贫乏的感官刺激如何能够产生出丰富的科学知识这一问题,主张仔细地考察这一过程发现人是怎样习得知识的。这个过程可以借鉴心理学的研究方法,自然化认识论作为自然科学的一章。在这点上,自然化认识论的这种主张被其反对者说成是消除主义的、纯然描述而无规范可言的,也有支持者为其做有规范的辩护。加之蒯因对此问题表现出的含蓄,自然化认识论和规范性之间因此存在着一种备受争议却又复杂的关系。
From 1969, due to the naturalistic epistemology proposed by 蒯, naturalized epistemology has received widespread attention from philosophers and epistemologists, forming mixed opinions. Unlike the traditional advocacy-centered epistemology, the naturalization epistemology needs to address the issue of how poor sensory stimulation can produce a wealth of scientific knowledge and advocates a careful examination of how the process finds out about how one acquires knowledge. This process can learn from the psychology of research methods, naturalized epistemology as a chapter of the natural sciences. At this point, this claim of naturalized epistemology is described by its opponents as eliminationism, purely description without norms, and some supporters justify them. Moreover, there is a highly controversial but complicated relationship between the subtle and naturalized epistemology and normativeness that has emerged from this issue.