论文部分内容阅读
由于现实本身的不确定性和认知能力的局限性,人们用以反映并反作用于客观世界的主观语言必然具有模糊性。恰当地使用模糊限制语既能增强语言的表现力,又能使表达含蓄礼貌,从而达到良好的交际效果。本文以美国总统辩论为研究对象,以合作原则和面子保全理论为基础,运用定性研究的方法尝试分析四类模糊限制语(程度变动语、范围变动语、直接缓和语、间接缓和语)在政治语篇中的使用情况及语用功能。
Due to the uncertainty of reality itself and the limitation of cognitive ability, the subjective language that people use to reflect and react to the objective world is inevitably ambiguous. Proper use of hedges not only enhances the expressive power of language, but also makes the expression of subtle politeness so as to achieve good communicative effect. Based on the principle of cooperation and face preservation theory, this paper uses qualitative methods to analyze the influence of the four types of hedges (degree of change, range of change, direct moderation, and indirect moderation) on politics Discourse usage and pragmatic functions.