近几年来,在社科规划课题的审批中,据我了解的部分情况,存在着以下不正之风:一是“内定风”。每年都有国家级和省部级的“社科规划课题指南”下发到有关研究机构和高等院校,原则上是自由申报,平等竞争。但实际上在评审甚至在课题下发之前,许多课题的得主就已经内定了。据有关人士透露,某委在“八五”期间下发的课题中,得主预先内定者居然占到百分之六、七十以上。二是“人情风”。在对所剩不多尚没有得主的课题的竞争中,申报者能否中标也不完全取决于其实力如何,而是在很大程度上取决于申报者与能对审批施加影响者的关系如何;因此,每当申报和评审之际,申报者除认真填写申报材料外,还必须花费大量的精力、物力去游说和进行“感情投资”。无怪有申报成 In recent years, in the examination and approval of social science planning issues, as far as I understand some of the circumstances, there are the following unhealthy tendencies: First, “default wind ”. Every year, “guidelines for social sciences planning projects” issued by state and provincial ministries are distributed to relevant research institutes and institutions of higher learning. In principle, they are free to declare and compete on an equal footing. However, in fact, many subjects have already been agreed upon by the judges before the issue is issued. According to relevant sources, among the issues issued by the commission during the “85” period, winners of pre-determined people actually accounted for 6% or more and 70% or more. Second, “human style ”. In the competition for the remaining few subjects with no winners, whether or not the applicant wins the bid depends not entirely on his strength, but on how the relationship between the applicant and those who can influence the approval Therefore, in addition to earnestly filling in the application materials, applicants must spend a lot of energy and resources on lobbying and conducting “emotional investment” whenever applying and reviewing. No wonder there are declarations