论文部分内容阅读
关于滥用职权罪的主观罪过,刑法学界主要有七种观点:过失说、间接故意与过失说、间接故意说、直接故意说、故意与过失并存说、故意说等。本文在对刑法学界有关滥用职权罪的主观罪过的各种观点进行简略评述的基础上,通过从刑法总则的层面、立法意图、法定刑以及与类似罪状的比较四方面的分析,得出滥用职权罪的主观罪过应为过失而不是故意。
As for the subjective sin of abusing power, there are mainly seven kinds of viewpoints in criminal law scholarship: negligence, indirect intentional and negligent, indirect deliberately speaking, direct intentional speaking, coexistence of intentional negligence and deliberate say. On the basis of a brief review of the various views on the subjective sin of abuse of power in criminal law jurisprudence, this article draws the conclusion that abuse of power should be based on the general rules of criminal law, the legislative intent, the statutory punishment and the comparison with similar crimes Subjective sin of sin should be negligent rather than intentional.