论文部分内容阅读
“避风港原则”是随着美国关于ISP侵权责任承担的立法思想转变而产生的。“避风港原则”规定了“通知”和“移除”两个要件,当权利人在面对版权侵权时以书面形式通知ISP,ISP在收到书面通知后及时有效的删除相关内容的,ISP就取得了抗辩权,这就是“避风港原则”对ISP的保护。我国著作权制度也吸收了该原则,但我国在立法层面存在着很多问题。在适用中却缺乏具体明确的程序,很容易造成该原则的滥用。在未来立法中应明确“通知”的实质要件,用法律明文规定的形式明确书面应包含的权利人的信息,侵权内容及相关信息,及时的期限,以及法律后果等内容。本文认为面对立法中的问题以及不断增多的版权纠纷,在司法实践中应该及时的完善著作权制度弥补法律缺陷,同时对于ISP与版权人而言应该更好的加强合作减少各自的社会成本。
“Safe Harbor Principles ” is the result of a shift in the legislative thinking on the commitment of the United States to ISPs’ tort liability. “Safe Harbor Principles ” provides “notice ” and “remove ” two elements, when the right holder in the face of copyright infringement in writing to notify ISP, ISP in writing promptly and effectively delete the notice Relevant content, ISP has obtained the right of defense, this is “safe harbor principle ” protects ISP. Our country’s copyright system also absorbs this principle, but our country has many problems at the legislative level. In the application of the lack of specific procedures, it is easy to cause the abuse of the principle. In the future legislation should be clear “notice ” the essential elements of the express provisions of the law expressly written should contain the rights of information, infringing content and related information, timely deadlines, as well as legal consequences and so on. This article argues that in the face of the problems in the legislation and the increasing number of copyright disputes, the copyright system should be improved in time to make up for the legal flaws in judicial practice. At the same time, ISPs and copyright owners should strengthen cooperation to reduce their social costs.