论文部分内容阅读
2015年2月,沈阳市东陵区人民检察院接到一封匿名举报信,反映东陵区第三初级中学校长蔡玉军利用职务之便,在书商推销教辅资料过程中,大肆收受回扣。接到举报线索后,东陵区人民检察院立即展开秘密侦查。几天后,有关蔡玉军的基本情况反馈回来了:蔡玉军,54岁,从2008年起担任东陵三中校长至今。此前,因为经济问题已经被纪委多次查过,均因证据不足而搁浅。如果蔡玉军真的没有问题,那么举报人为什么要持续不断地举报呢?
In February 2015, the People’s Procuratorate of Dongling District of Shenyang received an anonymous letter of complaint, which reflects the fact that Cai Yujun, the third junior high school principal in Dongling District, took advantage of his position in the process of selling books and supplementary materials to booksellers for wantonly receiving kickbacks. After receiving clues to report, Dongling District People’s Procuratorate immediately launched a secret investigation. A few days later, the basic situation of Cai Yujun feedback back: Tsai Yu-jun, 54 years old, since 2008 as the principal of the Third Dongling so far. Prior to this, because the economic problems have been checked by the Commission for Discipline Inspection many times, they all ran aground because of insufficient evidence. If Cai Yujun really no problem, then the whistleblower why keep reporting?