许多同志写突出政治的稿子,运用对比的方法,谈甜头,说苦头,这很好。不怕不识货,只怕货比货。突出政治会怎样,不突出政治会怎样,拿事实作对比,说服力自然强。但是,我们在看稿中,发现不少这样的稿子,虽然有对比,可是内容大体相同,没有新鲜感,没有自己的特点。怎样解决这个问题?这里,根据我们看稿的体会,提出几点意见。首先,要紧扣突出改治中的活思想,针对具体问题作对比。不少写突出政治的稿子,为什么不能有自己独特的主题呢?重要的原因就是没有抓住突出政治中的活思想,有目的地解决突出政治中的一个认识问题,泛泛地谈甜头谈苦头,没有具体“靶子”,打不中要害,不能使读者有具体的感受和启发。这样搞报 Many comrades write excellent political manuscripts. It is good to use contrasting methods to talk about sweetness and bitterness. Not afraid of not knowing the goods, I’m afraid goods than goods. What will be the highlights of politics? What is the difference between politics and politics? However, when we read the draft, we found that quite a few such drafts, though contrasted, are generally the same in content, have no freshness and do not have their own characteristics. How to solve this problem? Here, according to our reading experience, put forward a few comments. First of all, it is necessary to give prominence to the idea of ​​living in the process of reorganization and make comparison on specific issues. Why is it that they can not have their own unique themes? Some of the important reasons are that they have failed to seize the prominent political thinking and purposefully solve one of the prominent problems in politics, No specific “target”, hit the key, can not make the reader have a specific feeling and inspiration. Such a newspaper