儿童抑郁量表信度和效度评价

来源 :现代预防医学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:bbatdead
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
[目的]评价儿童抑郁量表(CDI)在中国中小学生中应用的可行性。[方法]由澳大利亚昆士兰大学提供的Kovacs编制的儿童抑郁量表(CDI)并对其进行翻译,选取合肥市6613名7~18岁的城乡中小学生并对其进行CDI的测评及信度效度评价。[结果]CDI具有较高的信度和效度:Cronbachα系数为0.82,分半信度为0.79,重测信度为0.89;一阶因素分析共获得7个因子,二阶因素分析获得1个因子(特征值为2.845),且各条目得分与量表总分的相关系数均在0.20以上(P值均小于0.01),表明CDI具有较好的结构效度;CDI与心理复原力问卷得分呈负相关、与功能失调性态度问卷得分呈正相关、与流调用抑郁自评量表得分呈正相关,显示CDI具有较好的效标关联效度和聚合效度。[结论]CDI适合合肥地区中小学生抑郁症状的评定。 [Objective] To evaluate the feasibility of using Children’s Depression Scale (CDI) in primary and secondary school students in China. [Method] The children’s depression scale (CDI) prepared by Kovacs provided by the University of Queensland, Australia was translated and translated. 6613 urban and rural primary and middle school students aged 7-18 in Hefei were selected for CDI and reliability validity Evaluation. [Results] The CDI has high reliability and validity: the Cronbachα coefficient is 0.82, the semi-reliability is 0.79 and the retest reliability is 0.89. Seven factors are obtained by first-order factor analysis and one by second-order factor analysis Factor (eigenvalue is 2.845), and the correlation coefficients between each item score and the total score of the scale were above 0.20 (P values ​​were less than 0.01), indicating that CDI has good structural validity; score of CDI and psychological resilience questionnaire was Negative correlation with the score of dysfunctional attitude questionnaire was positively correlated with the score of self-rating depression scale, which showed that CDI had better criterion-related validity and aggregate validity. [Conclusion] CDI is suitable for the assessment of depression in primary and secondary school students in Hefei.
其他文献
摘要:作者在文中结合信息技术教学实际,从四个方面对分层导学模式进行了尝试,即学生层次的分层、教学目标的分层、教学效果的分层、作业评价的分层,构成了和谐生动、丰富多彩的课堂。  关键词:课程标准;分层次教学;目标分层;环节分层;评价分层  中图分类号:G434文献标识码:A 文章编号:1992-7711(2013)09-043-1  一、学生层次化  1.信息技术基础知识和基本技能方面的差异。由于家