论文部分内容阅读
我国物权法未规定优先权作为物权的一个类型,本文立足于对工资债权这一特殊债权类型的分析,认为有必要区分特殊债权类型而规定工资债权应具有对抗抵押权的物权性优先受偿效力。从法律体系的协调来看,我国物权法未实现绝对的物权公示原则,而存有例外,且做此规定在物权公示及标的物特定方面均可做合理解释。因此,从必要性和可能性两方面,优先权的物权性质应该可得承认。
The Property Law of our country does not stipulate priority as a kind of real right. Based on the analysis of the type of special claims of wage claims, this paper argues that it is necessary to distinguish the types of special claims and stipulate that the wage claims should be given priority against the real right of the mortgage Effectiveness. From the perspective of the coordination of the legal system, China’s property law does not achieve the absolute principle of publicity of property, and there are exceptions, and this provision can be reasonably explained in the specific aspects of property rights publicity and the subject matter. Therefore, the nature of the right of priority should be acknowledged from both the necessity and the possibility.